/

Woman convicted of assaulting trooper gets four years

7 mins read

FARMINGTON – Defiant to the court’s final remarks, a New Sharon woman faces a significant prison sentence following Thursday’s sentencing hearing in Franklin County Superior Court.


Carol Murphy, 65, of New Sharon

Carol Murphy, 65, of 248 Lane Road, was sentenced to four years in a Department of Corrections’ facility for assault on an officer, a Class C felony. She was also sentenced to 30 days of incarceration, following a contempt hearing ordered by Justice Michaela Murphy in regards to the defendant’s behavior at Wednesday’s jury trial.

Murphy stands convicted of refusing to submit to arrest or detention, criminal use of an electronic weapon, and two counts of cruelty to animals, all Class D misdemeanors, in addition to assaulting Maine State Police Trooper Aaron Turcotte with a stungun when he held the door open for her as she left her house.

Turcotte had responded to the Murphy property on Oct. 14, 2009, after receiving information that Murphy had numerous pets in her house, which would be in violation of a lifetime ban on the possession of animals, and that a warrant for her arrest had been issued in regards to unpaid fines. After allowing her time to gather some things and lock up, Tucotte was attacked by Murphy, who was wielding a stungun.

“The law says if you have a bad warrant and you try to arrest me,” she says on a tape recording of the incident, which was played for the jury at Thursday’s trial, “then I can kill you.”

Maine Department of Agriculture’s Animal Welfare Program was asked to remove a number of animals from the home the next morning. Christine Fraser, a veterinarian with the AWP, testified that she and other personnel seized more than 40 animals, ranging from dogs and cats to birds to a miniature donkey and pot-bellied pig. Several farm animals, such as ducks, chickens and alpacas, were also found on the property.

The condition of two of these animals, an emaciated dog and the pig, directly prompted the two cruelty to animal charges. 

At the sentencing hearing, Assistant District Attorney James Andrews asked for a prison sentence approaching three years in duration, calling Murphy’s attack intentional, premeditated and unprovoked. Furthermore, Andrews argued, while Murphy had only the 2005 misdemeanor conviction on her criminal record, she had shown a disturbing trend of defiant behavior in regards to the legal system and law enforcement officers.

Turcotte addressed the court briefly, telling Justice Murphy that he was concerned about the next officer who interacted with Murphy.

“Is there going to be a next time?” he said.

Murphy, for her part, reiterated objections voiced repeatedly over the course of Thursday’s trial and other previous court appearances. She said that the Justice Murphy and the Franklin County Superior Court did not have “jurisdiction” over her, as she had filed a lawsuit of some kind in Boston. She continued to deny that she had even been convicted in 2005, due to “over 50 criminal violations” on the part of the state of Maine, and that the federal government would stop sending money, if this state violated her rights again.

In addition to a number of interruptions, Murphy addressed the court both during the sentence hearing and contempt proceeding. In both cases she delivered a lengthy, at-times rambling statement, in which she talked about the state’s “criminal acts,” the “illegal” nature of the custody hearing at which the state seized her animals, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (the organization which informed the state police that Murphy was housing animals again), which she termed as a “terrorist organization.”

Murphy also said that she did not want to kill Tucotte, but “could have shot him dead and walked away,” because he was a “front man” for AWP Director Norma Worley and the warrant was “no good.”

Justice Murphy cited this statement in her remarks, noting that the defendant had been smiling while Wednesday’s tape recording played through the attack on Tucotte.

“It’s very clear to the court,” Justice Murphy said, “that [Murphy] has absolutely no regrets for what she put him through.”

Justice Murphy commended Tucotte for his conduct throughout the incident, describing it as “exemplary” and saying the trooper had displayed nothing but “professionalism and decency” toward Murphy. Instead of responding in kind, Justice Murphy said, the defendant had attacked him in an “unprovoked and in a cold-blooded manner.” 

Justice Murphy also noted that Murphy had refused any standard forensic evaluation, but that she had been observed by the State Forensic Service for a 10-day period, at the order of the court. The conclusion of a report filed by Dr. Ann LeBlanc had been that Murphy appeared to suffer from “no significant delusions or psychological thinking.”

The court also rejected any possibility of probation, opting for a straight sentence due to Murphy’s past history with the legal system. Justice Murphy said that the defendant represented a “significant risk to public safety,” which factored into her decision to sentence Murphy to four years in prison. The maximum sentence allowable for a Class C felony is five years.

Murphy was also sentenced to nine months for each of the four Class D misdemeanor convictions, with those sentences to be served concurrently to the four-year sentence. Justice Murphy imposed another lifetime ban on Murphy possessing animals.

In the contempt hearing, which preceded sentencing, Justice Murphy said that the defendant’s conduct at Wednesday’s trail, which included not rising for judge or jury, interrupting and talking over witnesses and Andrews, referring to the proceedings repeatedly as a “racketeering” operation, and referring to Justice Murphy in a derogatory manner, constituted “actual and willful obstruction.”

Justice Murphy sentenced Murphy to 30 days in jail, the maximum sentence allowable under a Rule 66 contempt proceeding.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 Comments

  1. A 65 yo woman beats up a 25 yo Trooper and she gets 4 years in jail……maybe we should get tougher Troopers……or hire her

  2. I really hope she gets some kind of couseling, no matter how long she serves in jail she will get out and do this all over again!!!!

  3. Old Timer, I think you are way off on your comments. If you have been reading the articles, the Troopers simply held the door open for Murphy and she shocked him on his neck. After that happened, the Trooper took her to jail. Think about it moron!

  4. SHE HAD A DEAD PONY IN HER KITCHEN…… THE FIRST TIME SHE WAS CAUGHT…. I THINK THAT MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE JAIL TIME??!!!! I’M SURE AARON COULD HAVE TAKEN HER!!!

  5. She also had a goose that was walking around on infected stumps the first time she was convicted. She has no respect for the law and is a real danger to anyone she feels has caused her a problem. I hope she serves her full sentence for the well being of the judges, animal welfare workers and others. She is lucky the trooper did not overreact and shoot her dead. When she appealed her first case the picturers of dead animals were horrendous. There was a dead cow in the driveway, a dead lamb with its tummy all drawn in from starvation. Anyone who defends this person does not really know her background. She left the State of Mass after the animal welfare worker started trying to get into her home. The floorboards of the house had to be torn out to get the stench out.

  6. Having worked in the animal welfare field,I can tell you that these animal cruelty cases can go on and on and on.In the meantime dogs and cats and any other animal are in limbo.Dogs go to shelters and cannot be walked or handled to keep them socialized .cats stay seperated from other cats and they are considered “court cases”.the sooner these animals can be released from her the better.As far as the assault,wrong is wrong .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.